|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
Home
|
|
|
|
Check out the latest:
|
Articles
|
|
Thursday, 20 May 2010 |
Registry doesn’t do anything to help protect Canadians
by Dylan Shott The Gateway, University of Alberta
Thanks to intervention by Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, feeble
gun-control measures may survive what should have been a fatal blow. A
private member’s bill currently being sent through the House of Commons
aims to abolish the long-gun registry, which was established under the
1995 Liberal government. The new bill, C-391, passed first and second
readings in the House, and was to go through its third reading as a
free vote.
But the corruption of democracy reared its ugly head when Ignatieff
decided he would whip the vote. It’s contemptible to see MPs ignoring
the wishes of their constituents, an unyielding leader dictating policy
on private members’ bills, and the continuation of the $2-billion
boondoggle that is the failed long-gun registry. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Articles
|
|
Wednesday, 19 May 2010 |
Retired Winnipeg inspector loves being right by Jack S. Tinsley, Winnipeg Police Service (ret)
It is with great interest that I have watched the reactions of the
Canadian public last week to the recent media coverage of the Canadian
long-gun registry and our minority Conservative government's bill to
repeal it. Hopefully, the facts will prevail and the myths and
political rhetoric surrounding it will be seen for what they really are. The
long-gun registry was created by the majority Liberal government in
power at the time in the wake of the shooting tragedy at Polytechnique
College in Montreal in December of 1989. Whether it was a genuine --
but nevertheless ill-conceived -- plan to prevent gun crime or an
opportune time to win the favour of voters in the wake of another
demented criminal's act of insanity is open for discussion. I'd like to
believe it was for the former reason. But I don't. The long-gun
registry was implemented for two reasons: to prevent gun crime and to
save lives. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
News
|
|
Tuesday, 11 May 2010 |
|

May issue laws an abuse just waiting to happen
by Dennis E. Florian GunOwnersResource staff
For years now, all of us have known quite well that anything even remotely resembling "may issue" permit laws is a recipe for cronyism, bribes and corruption of all flavours. Now we have even more proof, in the unfolding of the latest chapter of Liberal party slime and sleaze currently playing itself out in Quebec. Tony Tomassi, Quebec’s Family Minister, has been accused of accepting bribes from Luigi Corelli, a Liberal party financial supporter who had, by pure coincidence, won plenty of government contracts. Some Canadians may roll their eyes and say that it's just a rerun of Adscam and the idea of the federal Liberals taking money is nothing new, so why should provincial ones be any different? While Liberal money laundering is nothing new, there is one new little angle to this particular story: It seems Corelli had tried to get an ATC (Authorization To Carry, Canada's permit to carry a concealed firearm) and been denied by the province's CFO (Chief Firearms Officer). He ended up getting the thing anyway though; right after a meeting with Jacques Dupuis - the Quebec Public Security Minister - which was set up by, you guessed it, Mr. Tomassi. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
The GOR Blog
|
|
Tuesday, 27 April 2010 |
|
Hello, and welcome to all the Canadian Gun Nutz! Not one of them? Don't worry, you might find this amusing anyway. As you may or may not already know, everybody's favourite meteorological melonhead (those who know him will get that one) decided to do his own little Daniel in the lions' den bit and went on Focal Point with Nancy Coldham (airs on Rogers TV in Newmarket, Ontario) on March 24th. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
News
|
|
Friday, 26 March 2010 |
The inevitable abuse of RCMP authority rears its ugly head
by CSSA/CILA Alert
Since the early days of Bill C-68 the classification of firearms has been a
real and valid concern of Canadian gun owners. The arbitrary reclassification of
some firearms and the refusal to classify others has not only been a violation
of our rights, it has resulted in the confiscation of personal property. This
has had a significant financial impact on numerous law abiding citizens. [Note: All emphasis and parenthetical commentary in the following article has been added by the editorial staff of GunOwnersResource and did not appear in the original CSSA release.]
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
Food4Thought
People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence, they're begging for rule by brute force, when the biggest, strongest animals among men were always automatically 'right.' Guns ended that, and social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make it work. L. Neil Smith, The Probability Broach
Who's Online
We have 4 guests online
|